RF Terminology Harmonization for Broadband-VPN Integration in Uzbekistan: Implications for Propagation Modeling and Hardware Interoperability

Abstract

Terminologies in Uzbekistan are inconsistent in the wake of the change in the broadband and VPN infrastructure beyond just nomenclature they carry with them direct consequences in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), signal propagation modeling, and RF hardware integration. In this paper we explore the technical vocabulary standardization loopholes that exist in the different Uzbek telecommunication networks and how they have impacted the system level interoperability values especially in cases involving VPN tunnel over wireless links and hybrid RF optical links. Applying a multi-phased strategy by taking interviews of stakeholders, regulatory documentary selection, and experimental imitation of terminological misalignments, the research unearths the impact of inconsistent terminology on antenna matching, routing performance and deployment of RF systems. The findings point out to some confusion in definition of VPN and broadband documentation that contributes to propagation error, impedance mismatch, and failure in security configuration at the physical layer. The proposed solution to these problems includes the harmonized national technical lexicon that is aligned with the standards of ITU, IEEE 802, and IETF. The offered scheme does not only promote semantic uniformity but also increases signal integrity, compliance of RF systems, and propagation conscious design techniques within integrated communication systems.