Cognitive MAC Protocol for Dynamic Spectrum Access in Opportunistic Wireless Networks with Channel Modelling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31838/NJAP/08.01.01Keywords:
Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs), Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol, Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA), Opportunistic Wireless Networks, Channel Modeling, Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Spectrum Prediction, Collision Avoidance, Adaptive Back off Mechanism, Spectrum Utilization EfficiencyAbstract
The proposed novel Cognitive Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol reproduced in this paper is optimally suited to the Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) in opportunistic wireless networks, and more specifically has been designed to improve spectrum efficiency, reduce interference, and enable adaptive communication strategies under the challenging conditions that have to be dealt with adversely and at a faster pace. The suggested protocol combines the real-time channel modeling by the means of Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to dynamically estimate the status of the licensed channel occupancy and predict the main user (PU) activity patterns. Using this predictive Intelligence in the MAC layer, delay sensitive applications can pre-select idle channels more reliably, allowing more efficient and collision-free communication in secondary users (SUs). Architecture uses adaptive slot scheduling, probabilistic back off mechanisms and a cooperative sensing scheme that aim to improve the throughput and reduce the access delay in multi-user cognitive radio environment. The simulation experiments carried out in MATLAB and NS-3 cloud provide the analysis of the protocol performance throughput, access latency, spectrum utilization, and collision probability. The experimental results validate that the proposed MAC protocol is far superior than traditional contention based as well as fixed- slot MAC protocol, especially when PU activity level is high, and SU deployment is dense. The channel prediction also implemented besides optimizing the spectrum use helps minimize unnecessary time wastage on duplicate sensing iterations, as well as backoff, duration. In addition, the protocol shows strong scalability and flexibility in various RF conditions thus it can be functional in deploying practical applications in smart city infrastructures, the Industrial IoT system, and the evolving wireless access networks. The study calls out existing deficits in contemporary MAC layer designs and fills them with a smart and flexible system that balances decisions on how to access the spectrum, real-time channel states, and behavior of primary users. This paper ends with information on the scalability of the protocol, the property of the trade-offs between the accuracy of sensing and the latency of the system, and suggestions on how to improve upon the system with the help of deep reinforcement learning as well as the mobility-aware scheduling of the next-generation cognitive radio networks.References
1. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2004.839380
2. Miki, M., Yamauchi, T., & Kobayashi, S. (2024). Effectiveness of MAC Systems based on LSM and their security policy configuration for protecting IoT devices. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 14(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2024.I3.018
3. Guevara, K. G., Guevara, L. A. R., Gonzales, T. V. P., Neyra-Panta, M. J., Gálvez, J. F. E., & Saavedra, N. L. C. (2024). Review of scientific literature on social networks in organizations. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 14(4), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.4.19
4. Palanisamy, R., Jayapal, S., Rafi, M. R., Kaliyamoorthy, K., & Kattubadi, J. B. (2023). Consistent information broadcast over cognitive radio ad hoc networks. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology, 14(1), 222–228.
5. Kavitha, S., & Kaniezhil, R. (2023). Enhanced wireless network usage and loading on network delay using cognitive radio network. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications,
14(4), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.58346/JOWUA.2023.I4.002
6. Reddy, S., & Mohan, P. (2024). Optimizing energy efficiency in wireless power transmission systems for industrial applications. Association Journal of Interdisciplinary Technics in Engineering Mechanics, 2(2), 19–23.12
7. Uvarajan, K. P. (2025). Design of a hybrid renewable energy system for rural electrification using power electronics. National Journal of Electrical Electronics and Automation Technologies, 1(1), 24–32.
8. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W. Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 50(13), 2127–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001
9. Al-Yateem, N., Ismail, L., & Ahmad, M. (2024). A comprehensive analysis on semiconductor devices and circuits. Progress in Electronics and Communication Engineering, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31838/PECE/02.01.01
10. Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 11(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2009.090109
11. Flammini, F., & Trasnea, G. (2025). Battery-powered embedded systems in IoT applications: Low power design techniques. SCCTS Journal of Embedded Systems Design and Applications, 2(2), 39–46.
12. Cheng, S., Yu, F. R., & Liu, H. (2011). Channel prediction based on hidden Markov model in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Network, 25(6), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2011.6094026
13. Kavitha, M. (2024). Environmental monitoring using IoT based wireless sensor networks: A case study. Journal of Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT, 1(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.31838/WSNIOT/01.01.08
14. McCorkindale, W., & Ghahramani, R. (2025). Machine learning in chemical engineering for future trends and recent applications. Innovative Reviews in Engineering and Science, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31838/INES/03.02.01
15. Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2013). An efficient MAC protocol for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(5), 2376–2385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2013.032713.120540
16. Surendar, A. (2024). Survey and future directions on fault tolerance mechanisms in reconfigurable computing. SCCTS Transactions on Reconfigurable Computing, 1(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.31838/RCC/01.01.06
17. Bicen, A., Lee, H., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2014). Joint channel and power allocation in cognitive radio networks under fading and primary user activity. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(11), 2190–2203. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2014.141117
18. Kazeminezhad, S. K. (2015). Recent time synchronization protocols in wireless sensor networks. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 249–257.
19. Zeng, K., Pawelczak, P., & Cabric, D. (2011). Reinforcement learning based spectrum sensing schedule in multi-channel cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2011 (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2011.6133886





