Cross-Layer MAC-Routing Protocol Design for Indoor WLANs with Integrated Channel Modeling under Dynamic Load Conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31838/NJAP/07.03.17

Keywords:

Cross-layer optimization, Indoor WLAN, Dynamic load, MAC-Routing protocol, HMM-based channel prediction, NS-3 simulation, Contention window adaptation, ETX metric enhancement, Interference modeling, Low-latency networking

Abstract

High density environments like smart buildings, offices, and other public places are deploying their indoor Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) which in turn have problems of user mobility, dynamic traffic demands, as well as the complex propagation of RF networks and can no longer follow standard communication protocols. Performance can be seriously impaired by multipath fading, interference and congestion, in these environments and this is compounded by the strict design of the network protocol layers in older network architectures. This paper brings forward a new cross-layer MAC-Routing Protocol (CLMRP) that will include RF-aware channel modeling and adaptive control techniques that will allow the network in question to work optimally in a dynamic indoor environment. At the physical layer, it uses a lightweight Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to classify in real time the channel (through utilised metrics such as received signal strength indicator (RSSI), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and packet success rates). Such forecasts are used to update Medium Access Control (MAC) layer parameters such as body mass index (BMI) to tune contention window parameters (CWmin, CWmax) and minimize collisions and optimize medium access. At the same time, the routing layer adjusts the metric, called Expected Transmission Count (ETX) to take into consideration the real-time queue occupancy along with projected link quality, which leads to an increase in the stability of the path and a decrease in the end-to-end delay. Most importantly, the schema presented proposes to incorporate antenna behavior and the RF front-end properties to the channel prediction and optimization scheme taking into account of the effect of the beamwidth, gain and directional patterns on the estimation of link quality. Results of simulations of the NS-3 environment based on IEEE 802.11 ax PHY models demonstrate that the CLMRP protocol is much more efficient in comparison with other conventional MAC and routing protocols such as IEEE 802.11 DCF with AODV and DSR, that results in 40% increased throughput, 30% decrease in delays and high efficiency in reliability of packet delivery. Such results demonstrate the strengths of integrating RF propagation-aware simulation in a complement with smart cross-layer adaptation, thus identifying CLMRP as a promising solution to the next generation WLAN deployments that need robust and low latency and antenna-enhanced communications.

References

1. Mayilsamy, J., & Rangasamy, D.P. (2021). Enhanced routing schedule—Imbalanced classification algorithm for IOT

based software defined networks. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, 8(1), 01–09. https://

doi.org/10.9756/IAJSE/V8I1/IAJSE0801

2. Parizi, L., Dobrigkeit, J., & Wirth, K. (2025). Trends in software development for embedded systems in cyber-physical systems. SCCTS Journal of Embedded Systems Design and Applications, 2(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.31838/ESA/02.01.06

3. Karthika, J. (2025). Sparse signal recovery via reinforcement-learned basis selection in wireless sensor networks.

National Journal of Signal and Image Processing, 1(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.17051/NJSIP/01.01.06

4. Chiang, M., Low, S.H., Calderbank, A.R., & Doyle, J. C.(2007). Layering as optimization decomposition: A mathematical theory of network architectures. Proceedingsof the IEEE, 95(1), 255–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2006.887322

5. Sreevidya, B., & Supriya, M. (2024). Malicious nodes detection and avoidance using trust-based routing in critical data handling wireless sensor network applications. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 14(3), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2024.I3.013

6. Li, Z., Fang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2006). A novel MAC protocol with dynamic contention window adjustment

for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 5(9), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2006.1687755

7. Sethupathi, S., Singaravel, G., Gowtham, S., & Sathish Kumar, T. (2024). Cluster Head Selection for the Internet of Things (IoT) in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks (WSN) based on quality of service (QoS) by agile process. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology, 15(1), 01–05.

8. Poornimadarshini, S. (2025). Robust audio signal enhancement using hybrid spectral-temporal deep learning models in noisy environments. National Journal of Speech and Audio Processing, 1(1), 30–36.

9. Mao, M., Leng, S., Yang, K., & Zhang, Y. (2020). A deep reinforcement learning approach for intelligent resource management in wireless networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(1), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2947433

10. De Couto, D.S.J., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., & Morris, R. (2003). A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. pp. 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/938985.939000

11. Wang, H., & Zhang, X. (2019). A channel-aware MAC protocol based on HMM prediction for wireless sensor

networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 107(2), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06264-1

12. Aravind, B., Harikrishnan, S., Santhosh, G., Vijay, J.E., & Saran Suaji, T. (2023). An efficient privacy-aware authentication framework for mobile cloud computing. International Academic Journal of Innovative Research, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9756/IAJIR/V10I1/IAJIR1001

13. Anny Leema, A., Balakrishnan, P., & Jothiaruna, N. (2024). Harnessing the power of web scraping and machine learning to uncover customer empathy from online reviews. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 14(3), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.3.08

14. Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Fang, Y. (2004). A cross-layer optimization framework for multi-hop wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(5), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2006.882878

15. Sadulla, S. (2024). Next-generation semiconductor devices: Breakthroughs in materials and applications. Progress in Electronics and Communication Engineering, 1(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.31838/PECE/01.01.03

16. Fisenko, O., Adonina, L., Sosa, H.S., Arturo, S.G.G., Castro, A.S., Galarza, F.W.M., et al. (2023). Advancements in flexible antenna design: Enabling tri-band connectivity for WLAN, WiMAX, and 5G applications. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 14(3), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.58346/JOWUA.2023.I3.012

17. Sharma, V., & Bohra, M.I. (2018). Performance analysis of cross-layer MAC routing protocol in MANET using NS-3. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.197

18. James, A., Thomas, W., & Samuel, B. (2025). IoTenabled smart healthcare systems: Improvements to remote patient monitoring and diagnostics. Journal of Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT, 2(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.31838/WSNIOT/02.02.02

19. Arun Prasath, C. (2025). Performance analysis of induction motor drives under nonlinear load conditions. National Journal of Electrical Electronics and Automation Technologies, 1(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.17051/JEEAT/01.01.06

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Raja Praveen K N, Govind Singh Panwar, Damanjeet Aulakh, Kavitha M, Nirmalrani V, & Aneesh Wunnava. (2025). Cross-Layer MAC-Routing Protocol Design for Indoor WLANs with Integrated Channel Modeling under Dynamic Load Conditions. National Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 7(3), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.31838/NJAP/07.03.17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 191

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.